How does jumper end

Suddenly he teleports himself to a library and discovers that he has the ability to jump anywhere he wants. He decides to run away from home, moving to New York, and uses his power to rob a bank vault. Eight years later, David is living in a fancy apartment in New York and having a life full of adventure, traveling to the most exotic places in the world.

He decides to visit Millie in Ann Arbor and invites her to visit Rome. While in the Coliseum, David meets the jumper Griffin that explains to him that the dangerous Roland Cox and his team of paladins are chasing him and his family and friends are in danger. Sign In. Edit Jumper Jump to: Summaries 4 Synopsis 1. The synopsis below may give away important plot points.

Griffin is furious because he knows that the Paladins now have a device that will let them travel through the "Jump Scar" and follow David.

Sure enough, Roland arrives through the worm hole and wraps up David in his electro-net. Griffin manages to escape and stave off Roland until Roland returns back using the machine again. Millie releases David and wants to be taken home. Before David can comply, and a cable comes through and snatches Millie through it. Griffin wants to send over a bomb to destroy the Paladins, so he and David get into a round the world fight.

Eventually, Griffin ends up in an electrical tower, and David returns to Michigan. Then, David returns and fights with Roland capturing him and taking him to a spot that looks like the Grand Canyon. He leaves him there rather than feeding him to the sharks. His conclusion was, unfortunately, that his mother Diane Lane was a Paladin.

She comes to the door. He asks her what happened. I'm not going to ask about jumper genetics because I know that's not fair, but I was just curious. Chosen answer: It's certainly not out of the question. That being said, Sophie is only David's half-sister, as they have different fathers, so if the jumper traits came from David's father, or from some genetic combination of his parents, then Sophie would not share his abilities.

Separate from membership , this is to get updates about mistakes in recent releases. Addresses are not passed on to any third party, and are used solely for direct communication from this site. You can unsubscribe at any time. I know that thinking about all the movies you didn't see is one of the least productive ways to spend your time, but Jumper all but demands you do so. At a certain point, David convinces Griffin to join his fight by appealing to the idea of a limited-run superhero team-up.

By this point, I'd already long since written an entire movie trilogy about Jumpers as superheroes in my head, but it still wasn't very nice of the film to point out how self-evident that idea is, and then not give it to me. Or elsewhere, the question is raised, what choice do the religious zealots hunting the Jumpers have? Well, since we're told that this war has been going on since the Middle Ages, it seems awfully likely to me that the frighteningly authoritarian and secular Church that existed at that time might have come up with some very good uses for the Jumpers, especially since we're also told that the power manifests itself at age five.

Ignatius Loyola would have dropped dead of ecstasy if he'd been given those boys to brainwash. The religious Jumpers being used to hunt the rest: tell me that wouldn't have been at least marginally more interesting than what we got. Because, here's what we got: a young man steals his way to a fortune, assuming that eventually he'll pay it all back, lets everyone who ever knew him think that he's dead for eight years, he fucks his way across three continents while keeping it in his head that he's being true to his childhood sweetheart, he only leaves his hedonistic life to prove to that sweetheart that she should love him again, he leaves allies for dead and ends up incapacitating several innocent bystanders; ladies and gentlemen, our hero.

I don't find it in me to disagree with Roland says that he must be destroyed as an abomination. Of course, we are talking about Hayden Christensen versus Samuel Jackson. A famously inexpressive pretty boy versus one of the most badass mothers in the history of the cinema. Moreover, this is Jackson with frosty white hair, which is even more badass than his already dangerously high level of badassery.

Casting Samuel L. Jackson with frosty white hair turns out to be a really great way to score many unearned points for your villain. Casting Christensen proves that you are interested in an audience of teenage girls.

Indiscriminate teenage girls. I don't know if the film would have been better with an actor who doesn't naturally seem like such a smug asshole - I doubt it - but it wouldn't have been any worse. As young David, Max Thierot looks quite a lot like Christensen.